Does anyone use msn anymore 2017

Jason, Thank you for your reply I was worried if I stopped paying for the subscription that I would lose the extra emails which the whole family uses. From what I'm reading we also have to access the MSN email once every days to keep them active.

Is there anything else I should be aware of? After cancelling the subscription you will be not able to access MSN software and the emails stored on folders on computer. I was all ready in the process of saving archived emails to my computer But I am running into a snag.

And then I'm a little confused about accessing our email once every days to keep them active.. I thought we would not have it anymore once we discontinued the MSN premium? Also when you say my email capacity will get reduced from 10 GB to 5 GB. Of course it was a lot of work to keep it going. But that is the 1st Amendment for you…it requires work not tape over the mouth. You guys stopped comments because your reporting was so distorted that a common sense comment would expose your bias.

There are those who are passive and those who are aggressive. There are those who insult and there are those who can hold civilised argument without getting personal. MSN has swept the human condition under the carpet. This is a win for MSN to shut up those who may have something worthwhile hearing amongst the rot.

They disabled it because conservatives and hicks threw tantrums over every little article. No worries, though. Sure there were some that used the comment area to start arguments and it would go on and on about a bunch of nonsince but i still would like the option to comment and make my thoughts known.

I will stay on Yahoo and read the comments. A lot of the comments here are funny. You folks do realize that that when commenting, you had to go through the facebook plugin right? Comments removed, accounts deleted happened to me …ALL facebook. Funny about the comments above from obvious liberals. My observation was the majority of hate was spewed by liberals. Most of the articles posted for comment are from liberal media. Also funny that the obvious liberals above mention things about censorship and freedom of speech.

I signed up to FB specifically so I could comment. All my comments were fact based, backed up with links and I never used vulgar or aggressive language.

FB is the one that is dangerous…regardless of your political affiliations. It will be interesting to see what MS can come up with. Heck, it already started here. Why have you rid the comment section of giving personal views on your articles????? As an educated voter that has never voted party lines in my life, you seem to dislike the conservative views on most issues!!! Opinions are just that Opinions but to allow one side to foster your political agenda is not right.

I agree as an American I can vote my choice as does every American regardless of any bias or slant of the Media. You can call my post negative by your standards but it does not change my prospective on Media bias. Thank you and respectively have a great day. Too many crybabies with sensitive feeling are overjoyed about this MSN decision. So long MSN. Too many alternatives out there to put up with your censorship. Wow, no shock at all. MSN loves their echo chamber of leftist BS. Fine with me.

This is a trend that all online sources are doing. The spelling, grammar, etc. This is where I say bye MSN! Anyway your news is have baked anyway fakenews. I have mixed feelings for this statement. It seems to be a violation of our constitutionally granted the right of free speech and a dangerous measure designed to silence dissenting opinions. Once again we find out freedoms being taken away…No one is allowed to have an opinion unless it is the same as big brother…….

The old idea of tolerance was summed up as.. You must return the comment section. Hmm interesting. If you people have a problem with us expressing our thoughts then YOU need to find work elsewhere. Controlling dissenting opinions is what they do in countries like China and Iran. Many liberal news outlets have gone this route.

MSN pushes biased news, the comment section was people calling out their unethical and slanted views. By removing it, they are able to too influence more people tto their ideology and rhetoric and silence opposing views. Shame on MSN, just another new outlet not to be trusted. Now MSN has turned into a one sided trash can slash dump site of liberal one sided views.

Much like Tea Party and Libertarian Blogs are. I take everything with a grain of salt. Some of it is pretty stupid funny in a sad way. This denying the readers any chance of reply to the biased reporting and fake Liberal far lrft opinions in our media has been done so that the opinions of the masses can not be heard, the fake biased reporting of important subjects that affects all of us is being controlled by a media that is controlled by the money men that want to see globalisation so that they can have a cheap labour force on tap that is subsidised by the taxpayer at least in the UK it is.

The youth who are addicted to social media on silly phones and tablets are encouraged to waste away their time on these devices while they are brainwashed into accepting this globalist agenda without a fight.

Well, there you have it. Can we say censorship, or is that censored? Bye bye MSN, time to find another news feed. So where is this new platform for readers comments?

But real conversation should not stop….. Goodbye MSN. Readers should have the right to voice our opinions in a responsible and respectful manner. What you are doing by removing the comment section is nothing more than censorship.

I enjoyed MSN home page because I could make comments good or bad about the articles. Each comment I made is how I feel, but you have taken away my freedom of speech. Your email address will not be published. Submit a tip. Submit a tip Report an Error. Share this article:. Get our weekly newsletter.

Were an infant's disabilities after abuse news or invasion of privacy? Tweets from 2 Years Ago Libelous? Mail Online's Hopkins defends against Critic Monroe. July 27, at You can shove it. July 28, at Teresa says:. Diogenese says:. July 29, at Rachel Silberman says:. July 30, at Vito says:. July 31, at Sue says:. Ejon says:. August 1, at Lou the CPA says:. Shlabber says:. Christine says:. August 2, at Troy Crawford says:. Emilie L.

Sizer says:. Elden Buck Eichler says:. August 3, at David Kociol says:. August 4, at Wes says:. Rather than monitor for trolls and abusive comments Msn removes public commenting. Jennifer Harris says:. Frances says:. Bobby Whitman says:. My comments were moderated, folks. In other words, taken down. Patty Wolford says:.

August 7, at PuckSchmuck says:. August 8, at Stanley Moldenhauer says:. August 10, at Robin Ragland says:. August 12, at DrWorm says:. August 13, at Kazoo42 says:. LOUIS says:. August 14, at Erin says:. August 15, at Ascension says:. August 16, at Brenda says:. Early examples of social media networks combining the functionality of instant messaging services with that of open network-building opportunities included SixDegrees.

LinkedIn, focused primarily on professional networking, was launched in May Myspace August became fleetingly much more successful than any of its predecessors in this genre, before Facebook open to the general public since gradually closed the gap and attained market dominance.

Both Myspace and Facebook integrated simple message board-based groups with personal social network development. Twitter putting its focus on pithy public broadcasts though retaining a core of private networking functionality appeared in the same year as Facebook went public, with Instagram focused on photographic posts and exclusively available to Smartphone users following in , and Snapchat also limited to access by Smartphone in Here is our summary of major developments in the use of remote computer networks before the Internet, particularly in relation to the question of primitive steps towards the development of social media.

It is not a comprehensive technical history of networks before the Internet. Prior to the public launch of the privatised global Internet in , there were some more limited networking systems connecting computer users at a distance. The first to operate on the principle of a distributed network of direct peer-to-peer computer connections without the intermediary of a central computer was Arpanet, developed in and launched in , but it was created for the purpose of resilient government communications in the event of a nuclear attack on the United States, and in practice, it was used to connect computers at just four universities in the United States, with additional nodes in the UK and Norway added in Usage by anyone other than military personnel and validated others working on government contracts was expressly prohibited.

While direct peer-to-peer communications in text between users at a remote distance from each other were enabled by this system, and an email program serving Arpanet was launched as early as , the user base was too small for there to be sufficient incentive for anyone to develop fully functional social media applications. Arpanet was decommissioned in Another network called Community Memory was launched at Berkeley in , and featured a searchable bulletin board system, making it a primitive precursor to later forum applications.

A mainframe computer storing the database was served by a variety of user terminals in Berkeley and San Francisco. It was brought offline in its original form in , but it was relaunched not long after with enhanced network infrastructure, and remained locally popular until the plug was pulled in The National Science Foundation launched its own network called NFTNET, that operated using Arpanet infrastructure and system technology from , and continued to run after Arpanet was shut down in NFTNET provided a crucial bridge to the Internet, because in it started to promote the development of local private networks that could hook up to its system and therefore ultimately to each other at long distances.